Mind in Action: Experience and Embodied Cognition in Pragmatism (Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics)
暫譯: 行動中的心智:經驗與具身認知在實用主義中的應用(應用哲學、認識論與理性倫理學研究)

Pentti Määttänen

  • 出版商: Springer
  • 出版日期: 2015-04-21
  • 售價: $2,420
  • 貴賓價: 9.5$2,299
  • 語言: 英文
  • 頁數: 94
  • 裝訂: Hardcover
  • ISBN: 3319176226
  • ISBN-13: 9783319176222
  • 海外代購書籍(需單獨結帳)

相關主題

商品描述

The book questions two key dichotomies: that of the apparent and real, and that of the internal and external. This leads to revised notions of the structure of experience and the object of knowledge. Our world is experienced as possibilities of action, and to know is to know what to do. A further consequence is that the mind is best considered as a property of organisms’ interactions with their environment. The unit of analysis is the loop of action and perception, and the central concept is the notion of habit of action, which provides the embodied basis of cognition as the anticipation of action. This holds for non-linguistic tacit meanings as well as for linguistic meanings. Habit of action is a teleological notion and thus opens a possibility for defining intentionality and normativity in terms of the soft naturalism adopted in the book. The mind is embodied, and this embodiment determines our physical perspective on the world. Our sensory organs and other instruments give us instrumental access to the world, and this access is epistemic in character. The distinction between the physical and conceptual viewpoint allows us to define truth as the correspondence with operational fit. This embodied epistemic truth is however not a sign of antirealism, as the instrumentally accessed theoretical objects are precisely those objects that experimental science deals with.

 

商品描述(中文翻譯)

這本書質疑了兩個關鍵的二分法:表面與真實,以及內部與外部。這導致了對經驗結構和知識對象的修訂概念。我們的世界被經驗為行動的可能性,而知道就是知道該怎麼做。進一步的結果是,心智最好被視為有機體與其環境互動的屬性。分析的單位是行動與知覺的迴圈,而核心概念是行動習慣的概念,這為認知提供了作為行動預期的具身基礎。這適用於非語言的默會意義以及語言意義。行動習慣是一個目的論的概念,因此為定義意向性和規範性開啟了可能性,這是基於書中採用的柔性自然主義。心智是具身的,而這種具身性決定了我們對世界的物理觀點。我們的感官器官和其他工具使我們能夠以工具性的方式接觸世界,而這種接觸在本質上是認識論的。物理與概念觀點之間的區別使我們能夠將真理定義為與操作適配的對應。然而,這種具身的認識論真理並不是反現實主義的標誌,因為以工具性方式接觸的理論對象正是實驗科學所處理的對象。